The War On Terror

So after reading an article by a former government official, it occurred to me that he was right. We really need to use our common sense when evaluating the war on terror.

Let's start with 9/11. Stand back and think of the bigger picture here. Some 3rd world terrorists were capable of plotting this massive strike, and managed to elude the FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other agency to pull this off. And they managed to do it with...BOX CUTTERS!! Really!?!?

So since that day, we have had the shoe bomber, the underwear bomber and a r/c airplane bomber. In the case of the underwear bomber, he had coloured fireworks in his pants that wouldn't have blown up a can. And then the R/C bomber. Really!?!?



A remote controlled plane with C4 was going to blow up the Pentagon? It was hit by a 747 and barely left a hole, and one not big enough for the plane to fit into. Yet we are supposed to believe this tiny plane was going to do more damage than a multi-tonne plane loaded with jet fuel? Come on, use your head! The Times Square bomb plot...it would never have exploded. Every other plot has the same ending. So we are to believe the masterminds behind 9/11 can't even manage to get more than firework powder in someones pants?

If the terrorists wanted to do real damage, they would set off a bomb in the security lines at the airport. It would do far more damage than blowing up a plane. They could blow up an electrical substation. These are not guarded, and have only a chain link fence to protect them. Come on people, use your head. Have you ever seen a terrorist? I know I haven't. All of these plots were planted by the FBI/CIA to justify their existence.

When you step back and really look at things, what are we afraid of? These people have no nukes, no army, no navy and no missiles that can cross the ocean. Most of them barely have electricity or running water. Yet we are supposed to be terrified of them? It's time we took our craniums out of our posterior and realized we are being played!

The Patriot Act Revealed

The September 11^th, 2001 attacks on New York City and Washington D.C. Irrevocably changed the course of American history. Similar to the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbour, Hawaii sixty years earlier, this catastrophe horrified the American Public, and a nation felt besieged by the possibility of further attacks.

President Bush's rating soared to 90%, and his administration worked closely with Congress to pass a flurry of wide-reaching laws.

Conspiracy theories spread immediately. The spotty reporting of the 9/11 Commission did little to discourage them.

10 years later, sceptics and conspiracy theorists still debate particulars of the incident. By now, most people are familiar with the popular 9/11 conspiracy theories: The idea that somehow 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB. Or, that the American government covered up evidence of mistakes. But, there is another concern here; What laws were passed, exactly? And, how do they affect us, and Americans today?

Since it was signed into law in October 2001, The Patriot Act has become a subject of increasing controversy. According to scholars such as Elliot Mincburg, Director For People Of The American Way, The Justice Department has used terrorism as a guise to expand law enforcement powers in areas that are totally unrelated to terrorism.

It's true that The Patriot Act has been used to investigate non-terrorist crimes. In fact, the intelligence community was waiting for an opportunity to pass this sort of legislation. Far from being custom made legislation designed as a reaction to 9/11. The Patriot Act is instead an amalgamation of various powers the Intelligence Community has wanted for years. Yet is seems these expanded powers still fall short of some some agencies desires.

In 2005, Dan Eggen of The Washington Post, published a story exposing several FBI violations of 'Secret Surveillance' Laws. Including improperly seizing e-mail and banking records. And, conducting non-consenting physical searches.

These findings have cause researchers like David Sobel, The General consel of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, to speculate that this is simply the 'tip of the iceberg'.

What other abuses are out there? Finding the information can be tricky. For example: Title 5 of The Patriot Act , strengthens the power of National Security Letters, (NSL's). An NSL is a formal request for information regarding a person under surveillance.

These existed prior to The Patriot Act, but under the new law, they were applicable to American citizens, and contained gag-orders that prevented the recipient from informing anyone of the Letter. Subsequent legislation has softened these powers, but they still exist.

By 2004, nearly 300 American Municipalities had passed laws or formally disagreed with The Act. Urging congress to modify or repeal this legislation.

In the post-9/11 world, the average American, (and subsequently world) citizen has lost numerous legal protections. Supporters of the Law argue that this sacrifice has been both necessary and beneficial. Some claim that as many as fifteen, (15) terrorist attacks have been prevented thanks solely to The Patriot Act. However, to Privacy Advocates, and other opponents to The Act, it has been used more to invade the private lives of citizens than to prevent terrorism. And currently, no one knows exactly how much or how little privacy left to the average citizen.

Requests for more fact under the Freedom Of Information Act, (FOIA), are no safe bet. The FOIA has several exemptions including National Defence.

Not only is there something THEY don't want you to know, but legally they don't HAVE TO TELL YOU!

The 9/11 Effect

Don't you find it odd that this year, more than the nine previous, there is an astounding amount of coverage on the 9/11 False Flag Attack?

I know I haven't written anything in quite a while. For that I apologize, (You can blame my psychotic dirty ex-wife for that).

Now, back to talking about 9/11. Do you not to notice that every year, (and particularly this year) on, or around September 11^th, there are fresh new terror alerts?

“There is a new and credible threat to America, but it can't be confirmed”. <-- What the Hell is that? Are THEY just trying to keep us scared? Still counting on the “9/11 Effect”?

I'm going to play “The Devil's Advocate” here. Let's assume that the 'Official story' is correct. I'll assume that the largest attack on American soil was in fact a Terrorist attack. Some Arab guy, living in a cave in Afghanistan, working with only his laptop computer, designed, planned, and set into action a massive attack on the most secure country in the world... All by himself. That for the first, second, and third time in human history, STEEL FRAMED BUILDINGS fully collapsed into themselves due only to structural fire. That the passengers of Flight #93 overtook the highjackers, and crashed the plane into the ground, rather than try to fly it down, and have Air Traffic Control talk them through an Emergency Landing? Assuming that story is the correct one, Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda has won. We no longer have the liberties and 'freedoms' we once enjoyed. I'll set you a few examples: Air travel – Enough said. The Patriot Act – Again, need I say more?

I don't mean any disrespect to the thousands of people who died on September 11^th, 2001. What I am meaning to do is simple: To open your eyes. To show you that the 'Official Story' is a piece of crap. Not worth the paper that it's written on.

Now, let's look at what we know: Four jetliners were taken off course on September 11^th, 2001. Two of them were guided into The World Trade Center buildings #1 and #2. The other two jets are still technically missing. Almost no wreckage has been recovered from either The Pentagon, or in Shanksville PA. Let us also not forget that at all three sites, there have been no bodies of the passengers of those flights recovered. The ONLY thing that has been recovered is that of one, perfectly intact passport of a 'known terrorist'.

WTC #7 before it was demolished

World trade Center Building #7 that was located several blocks away collapsed onto itself too. We also know that all the other buildings surrounding WTC #1 and #2 were not damaged. At least not enough to cause them to collapse.

If the media repeats the same story over and over again, you will eventually believe it. Most humans are sheep. That's not an insult. It's a fact.

That being said, why haven't enough people asked the questions only a few do? Why are we all referred to as “The Truthers”? Why are we referred to as 'crazy', 'nuts', 'conspiracy theorists'?

The truth of the matter is this: We were lied to. The majority of people are too fucking stupid to see it. The facts don't stand up to scrutiny. Most of the massive events that occurred on September 11^th, 2001 are NOT scientifically possible.

Who writes this garbage? Better yet, who believes it?

I've said it before, I'll say it again, and I will continue to say it: Knowledge is power. Arm yourself! Learn to think for yourself! Question what you're told!!